Bull3t's Blog - Latest Comments in StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Nick Cobb — Mon, 22 Dec 2008 11:55:31 -0000

It is the best traffic in my opinion. Create good content and they'll stay. Pedople on SU aren't technically driven... they are typical internet users... not programmers and wed designers... get that through your head and you wont have any problems...\

Do diggers subscribe? redditors? Nope... and the time spent on a page is higher for SU when compared to either of those to. Kind of an inane post here.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Sonix — Thu, 03 Jul 2008 20:09:28 -0000

r u sure su traffic is not that good?i have been benefited a lot from it.some of my startup sites have gathered steam from su?i think its very usefull.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Mary Red Ring — Wed, 18 Jun 2008 17:13:35 -0000

Stumblers stumble for fun so when you look at the stats their bounce rate is just obscene for monetization purposes or to grow a blog readership it really is worthless.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Siddharth — Tue, 17 Jun 2008 20:35:30 -0000

I think the best quality visitors are by DIgg
also I knw that stumbleupon visitors are of low quality some of them just click stumble and then again stumble and they are counted to the visitors
even when they dont stay for much

But I think if even out of 25 visitors even 1 stays for more than 3 - 5 min that means SU has succeeded :)

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

muzammal — Thu, 29 May 2008 14:00:25 -0000

I use stumbleupon and other social networks to increase traffic towards my website.I think this traffic is reliable and adsense safe. However , if someone will try to spam stumble. His account will be automatically deleted.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Kit — Mon, 14 Apr 2008 15:29:28 -0000

I just checked my stats, and I have to agree with you to a point. the last 140 visitors from StumbleUpon stayed for an average of 5 seconds. I too got excited the first time 40 people showed up in a matter of hours from StumblUpon only to be dissapointed. Having said that, some of my stuble entries have caused Google to rank me higher on certain keywords which appear both on my site and in the Stumbleupon directory. That accounts for hundreds of visits per month.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Nascar — Wed, 19 Mar 2008 17:52:46 -0000

Extra traffic is never a BAD thing, they may not be the highest quality of hits, but if stumbleupon brings you 10 quality readers a month, or even every quarter, its ten more than you had.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Joomla Guy — Sat, 01 Mar 2008 13:17:05 -0000

I can see that there are huge differences between quality traffic versus quantity traffic (huge numbers but might not be targeted). Depending on the purpose of your blog, one or the other will be more useful for you. To me StumbleUpon traffic is equal to quality traffic.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Andrew Reynolds — Tue, 05 Feb 2008 00:03:34 -0000

Yeah, I agree with you. StumbleUpon could be a good start to get notice especially for the new bloggers. But I don't think that this is a good source for reliable traffic. But somehow it can contribute to the traffic that your website is getting.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Jordan — Wed, 30 Jan 2008 11:31:06 -0000

I disagree with you about that the people only come to read an article and then leave, this ain't true, I go through the website and read more about it sepcially when the writer is writing about attractive things and I may learn something new, many times I went to a website because of an article but then I find out that there are many things inside that webiste that are really interested, it is just depend on the reader him\herself,
About subsribing to the feed, well the only problems with that is the e-mails they gets. I guess those people who do those spam things made people really hate to type or register or subsribe anywhere in the web, not necessary in blog site but I mean everywhere on the internet,

For me I believe the article you wrote is nice even if I disagree with you, should you stop because only few subscribe? I don't think so,

Take care,
Regards.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Bull3t — Thu, 24 Jan 2008 06:24:22 -0000

Agreeably, short-term visitors are better than no visitors at all, because it helps to populate your blog even if the visitors don't read further than just the landing post. Some StumbleUpon visitors do subscribe to your feed, but as you have pointed out it is a very small amount; you received 30000 visitors to your blog from StumbleUpon and your subscriber count only increased by 50, that means that only 0.0016% of those visitors subscribed to your feed.

I am not really sure whether normal visitors would have a higher percentage, but just thought I would point that out.

I obviously don't benefit as much from StumbleUpon as you do, though. My blog isn't as well-known or popular as yours; I only get a mere 1000-3000 visitors a month. Maybe if my blog was a little more active and popular, I would benefit from StumbleUpon visitors and they would probably stay on my blog a little longer.

Anyway, thanks for taking the time to leave a comment.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Andy Bailey — Tue, 22 Jan 2008 13:37:44 -0000

I don't quite agree with you on this one. For sure, search engine visitors are more likely to stick around but you will still get them as well as visitors from stumbleupon and I think a short term visitor is better than no visitor at all.

Some of my posts have had some massive traffic spikes from stumbleupon and I can see a direct relation to the amount of subscribers to my feed following a surge.

a recent post of mine has received more than 30k views from stumbleupon and my subscriber count went up by more than 50 just from that page (I set a goal for my subscribe page and analytics shows many of them were at the stumbled page before they subscribed)

I agree that it's not the be-all and end-all of traffic sources but, every bit helps!

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Andrew Reynolds — Wed, 09 Jan 2008 19:56:00 -0000

If you have a quality blog then you will get more readers. StumbleUpon could be the best way to get more traffic, because if readers find it interesting, there's a possibility that they will subscribe and bookmark your blog.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Edward — Fri, 21 Dec 2007 08:40:25 -0000

It's true that SU users won't be staying for a long time but from my experience, it can bring a constant traffic to a blog compares to Digg, for my case I can get quite a decent amount from SU for a whole week if I write an interesting article

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Kango — Sun, 16 Dec 2007 01:57:27 -0000

You make a good point and ask a good question. I don't have the answer. However, I will say...StumbleUpon is bringing people to your site that would normally never be there...and as stated above, if your site is good, you might get some unexpected subscribers out of it.

Good luck to you!

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

SpaceAge — Fri, 14 Dec 2007 04:01:52 -0000

For the least part, traffic generated by stumble is traffic and bloggers need it. But whether you hold this traffic or not is entirely up to your blog. If your blog is good people may actually bookmark it so they can comeback to read and comment etc.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Bull3t — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 12:10:54 -0000

Yeah, I am happy with the traffic, but I just don't think that it is the best way to get people to comment on your blog or subscribe to your feed.

I normally read more than just the landing page of a blog when stumbling, but normally only if I like what I had landed on. When I say that, I don just mean content; if I like the content but hate the design of the website, most of the time I won't read more than just the landing page. Whereas if I like the design but don't like the content I will skim across some of the other posts. It's weird...

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Matt — Wed, 28 Nov 2007 11:59:33 -0000

I'm happy with the traffic. Sure maybe they don't always stick around... but maybe they do. I find lots of neat blogs when I am stumbling and I have subscribed to a lot more...

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Bull3t — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 16:00:57 -0000

True, I don't use many other Social Media sites apart from Digg but I would say that StumbleUpon brings in the highest quality and number of visitors even if they don't really stay on your blog for very long.

Re: StumbleUpon traffic really isn't all that good - Bull3t's Blog

Tibi Puiu — Sat, 24 Nov 2007 15:40:13 -0000

While I deeply share your sentiments on this one, you should consider that Stumble provides the best traffic quality-wise from all other social media giants.