http://bull3tsblog.disqus.com/enTue, 18 Nov 2008 18:44:09 -0000http://blog.bull3t.me.uk/archives/internet/world-wide-web-indicator-is-it-needed/#comment-5619920<p>While I agree in principal many would feel lost without their www. It is just as simple to define your domains with both www and non www. The problem is those who dont define their domain without the www. I had a customer who ran an intranet/extranet on our hosting service and refused to define the domain without the www. He used to say if they were too lazy to type it in then they didn't deserve to find his Portal. So if they truncated all the domains out there 10% of the web might go dark, which in retrospect might not be a bad thing!</p>Portland PortalsTue, 18 Nov 2008 18:44:09 -0000http://blog.bull3t.me.uk/archives/internet/world-wide-web-indicator-is-it-needed/#comment-5619919<p>I will try something more home system orientated at a later date, but until then my status on Linux as a home system stays as "not the best idea". I do use Linux for all of my websites and servers though and it has been perfect in that respect.But I agree with your blog because use of WWW show all the status of site.</p>parvinderSat, 31 May 2008 00:38:58 -0000http://blog.bull3t.me.uk/archives/internet/world-wide-web-indicator-is-it-needed/#comment-5619918<p>I agree. Getting rid of it now would just confuse people.</p>Jason PearsonSat, 22 Mar 2008 20:47:28 -0000